It's the end of a long week and you do the thing every business owner does. You open a browser, type your company's name into Google, and scan what comes back. Map pack looks fine. Rating is holding. Your website sits where it should. You close the laptop with the quiet satisfaction of someone who just checked the locks.
Except you didn't. You watched one room of a very large house. While you were googling yourself, a TikTok about your service was climbing past a hundred thousand views, a TripAdvisor reviewer was typing the words never again, a thread about your pricing was picking up steam on X, and an editor you have never heard of was adding a sentence about you to a Wikipedia page. None of it appeared in the search you just ran, and by the time any of it does, it will have been circulating for days.
That is the uncomfortable math of modern reputation: the conversation about your brand happens in at least ten distinct places, each with its own audience, its own norms, and its own speed. Google is one of them — an important one — but it is mostly where reputation gets looked up, not where it gets made. PigPR monitors ten sources, and the reason it is ten is that each one holds a different kind of signal. Here is the tour: what lives in each place, what you miss by skipping it, and who should be watching it hardest.
Reviews: the front door
Google reviews. If you run a local business, this is not one signal among many — it is the signal. The map pack is the first thing a referred customer sees when they run the background-check search on your name, and the rating inside it does more deciding than your website ever will. What the signal looks like: new reviews, star ratings, review velocity, and whether the owner bothers to respond. What you miss by not watching closely: the slow slide, where a 4.6 becomes a 4.3 over a quarter, one unremarkable three-star review at a time, because nothing about a three-star review trips anyone's mental alarm. You also miss the sudden cluster — three one-star reviews in a weekend after a single bad incident. Who it matters most for: anyone with a physical location or a service area, which is to say most local businesses live and die here.
TripAdvisor. If Google reviews are how neighbors judge you, TripAdvisor is how strangers do. This is where hospitality and restaurant reputation lives for the customers you have not met yet — travelers — and their deciding happens before they arrive, often weeks before. A family plans a long weekend and shortlists four restaurants off ratings and review text written by people like them. What the signal looks like: reviews, ratings, and your ranking within your category and city, which quietly determines whether you make the shortlist at all. What you miss: the international segment of your reputation, including runs of reviews in languages you do not read. Who it matters most for: hotels, restaurants, attractions, and tours — anywhere the customer commits before they ever see your front door.
News: the story that moves first
Google News. Press coverage moves faster than any other signal and shapes everything downstream of it. A story in a regional outlet becomes the thing reviewers reference, the thing social posts link to, the thing that outranks your own website for your name. What you miss by not watching: finding out about your own coverage from a customer, or worse, from a reporter calling for comment on a story you have not read. The first hours of a news cycle are the only part you can still influence, and those hours are exactly what unmonitored brands lose. Who it matters most for: anyone a journalist might plausibly write about, which includes more small businesses than their owners expect.
GDELT. This is the source most people have never heard of, and the reason it earns its slot. GDELT is a global news index that tracks coverage across outlets and languages at a scale no manual search can touch. In practice, that means the trade publication in your industry, the regional paper in the market you expanded into last year, the article in a language you do not speak — all of it lands in the same net. Google News sees the mainstream of your coverage; GDELT sees the long tail, and the long tail is where a story smolders before it jumps. Who it matters most for: brands operating in more than one market, public figures, and agencies whose clients assume no news means no news.
Social text: where complaints go to multiply
X (Twitter). X is where complaints go viral first, and the pattern is reliable: something happens, someone posts about it, and by the time a review appears anywhere else the screenshot has already done its rounds. Journalism happens here too — reporters find stories on X, which means a complaint thread is sometimes the rough draft of tomorrow's article. What you miss: the first day of a complaint cycle, the only stretch where a fast, human response can still change the trajectory. Who it matters most for: any brand with vocal customers, and anyone in an industry the press pays attention to.
Bluesky. Bluesky is smaller, and that is precisely why it is on the list. The audiences that concentrated there — tech, media, academia, early adopters — are disproportionately loud relative to their numbers, and disproportionately likely to be the people who write about you next. A thread from a journalist with a modest following there can set the agenda that reaches X and the press a day later. What you miss by skipping it: early warning from the audience most likely to turn an opinion into coverage. Who it matters most for: tech companies, media brands, and anyone whose reputation depends on what the chattering class is chattering about.
Social video: the highest-reach complaint format
TikTok and YouTube. A single video review or rant can out-reach a year of text reviews, because video does something text cannot: it shows. A shaky sixty-second clip of a dirty table is more persuasive than a paragraph, and the algorithm is happy to put it in front of people who have never searched for you. TikTok is where a bad experience becomes entertainment; YouTube is where it becomes a permanent, searchable review that can rank for your name for years. And underneath every video is a second conversation — hundreds of comments comparing experiences, turning one complaint into a crowd. What you miss by not watching: the highest-reach version of your reputation, and the comment section where it gets litigated. Who it matters most for: consumer brands, restaurants, venues, and anything a customer can point a phone at.
Reference: the slow, durable record
Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the slowest-moving reputation surface on this list and the most durable. Edits to your own page matter, but so do edits to pages that merely mention you — a founder's biography, a parent company, an industry article. Two failure modes are worth watching. The first is vandalism: someone edits in something false or crude, and it sits there. The second is quieter: PR-spin edits, where someone with a stake in your image polishes the page — other editors notice that too, and the public call-out can do more damage than whatever was being polished. What you miss: a change that sits for months and becomes the first thing journalists, students, and AI summaries repeat about you. Who it matters most for: public figures, established companies, and anyone notable enough to be written about at all.
China: a conversation you cannot see from here
Weibo. Weibo hosts the largest public Chinese-language conversation in the world, and for some brands it holds a bigger share of their reputation than every Western platform combined. If you are in entertainment, tourism, or any business with Chinese customers — a hotel group, a destination, a consumer brand — a meaningful part of what people say about you is being said here, invisible to every monitoring habit built on English-language platforms. PigPR monitors Weibo and translates posts to English with one click, so a spike in Mandarin-language conversation shows up in your feed as readable signal instead of a gap you did not know you had. The details are in the Weibo monitoring launch post.
Search itself: where reputation becomes position
Google rank tracking. The last source is the one you started with — but watched properly. Your position for branded searches (your name, your name plus reviews) and category searches (your trade plus your city) is a reputation metric in its own right, because it moves when the other nine signals move. A cluster of bad reviews, a news story, a fresher competitor — all of it eventually shows up as position. When you slide from second to sixth, that is not an SEO statistic wobbling; it is a share of high-intent customers meeting a competitor's stars instead of yours. We broke down how to track it in your Google ranking is a reputation metric.
The practical problem: nobody can watch ten places
Here is where the tour turns into arithmetic. Ten sources is already more than one person can check in a day with any consistency. Multiply by an agency's client roster — ten sources times fifteen clients is a hundred and fifty feeds — and manual watching does not fail because you are lazy. It fails by arithmetic. You check the loudest platforms for the neediest clients and quietly abandon the rest, which is to say you monitor the places you were already looking and none of the places you were not.
A unified console exists to collapse the ten back into one. Every mention — review, article, post, video, edit, rank movement — lands in a single feed. Duplicates get merged, so a story syndicated to forty outlets shows up once instead of forty times. Every item is tagged with sentiment, so the angry things surface first. And when something spikes — a sudden cluster of mentions on any source — an alert reaches you the day it happens, not the next time you remember to look. Because everything flows through one place, it can also roll up into a single brand health score per client, which is what turns a feed into a report.
The toggles matter more than they sound, because the honest truth about ten sources is that no single client needs all ten. A restaurant does not need Wikipedia monitoring. A public figure does not need TripAdvisor. A local plumber has no Weibo problem. The right watch list is per-client, and the presets exist so that building it takes minutes. How fresh the feed stays depends on your plan: sweeps run every six hours, every three hours, or every hour. For most local businesses, the six-hour cadence is already faster than any manual routine ever was. For a client mid-crisis, the hourly tier is the difference between catching a spike at breakfast and reading about it on the evening news.
The ten places are already talking about you. The only open question is whether you are in any of those rooms, or still standing in the one with the search bar. See what each plan includes, or book a demo and we will pull up your brand across all ten sources, live.
Frequently asked questions
Do I need to monitor all ten sources for every business?
No. The ten sources exist because different brands live in different places, not because every client needs every feed. Source toggles are set per client, with presets for common profiles, so a single-location restaurant might center on Google reviews, TripAdvisor, TikTok, and rank tracking, while a public figure centers on news, X, Bluesky, Wikipedia, and YouTube. The point of ten sources is that whichever two or three you actually need are covered.
What is GDELT, and why does it matter for reputation monitoring?
GDELT is a global news index that tracks coverage across outlets and languages worldwide, at a scale no manual search can match. It catches the stories Google News misses: trade publications in your industry, regional papers in markets you expanded into, articles in languages you do not speak. For brands with more than one market, it is the difference between no coverage and no coverage you know about.
How often does PigPR check these sources?
Sweeps run on a cadence set by your plan: every six hours, every three hours, or every hour. Even the slowest tier is far more frequent than any realistic manual routine, and the hourly tier exists for clients mid-crisis, where the gap between checks is the gap between catching a spike early and reading about it later.
I don't read Chinese. Is Weibo monitoring still useful?
Yes, and that is exactly why it is included. PigPR monitors Weibo and translates posts to English with one click, so a spike in Chinese-language conversation arrives in your feed as readable mentions rather than an invisible gap. For entertainment, tourism, and any brand with Chinese customers, this is often the single largest conversation about you.
Does PigPR monitor Reddit?
Not yet. Reddit monitoring is in the pipeline awaiting API approval, and it will join the console as an eleventh source when it clears. We would rather state the gap plainly than imply the current ten cover everything, because Reddit threads about brands can be substantial and we do not want you assuming otherwise.